Mutual Security Concerns Still Ignored 3 Years Later

In Dec. 2021, Russia presented peace treaty proposals to NATO and the US, pointing out that the encroachment of NATO towards Russia, (breaking the promise made in 1990), was a security threat to Russia.

They pointed out that previous treaties recognized that the only lasting security was mutual security, where all parties were equally assured.

The NATO/US version of "I will arm myself to the teeth with weapons pointed at you and that way I feel secure" is obviously not fair, or to put in current terms, equitable, to the country the weapons are pointed at.

The US and NATO ignored Russia's proposals, moved more Kiev troops to the Donbass, talked about giving Ukraine nuclear weapons, and increased the shelling of the citizens in Donbass.

Putin told the west that if they ignored Russia's security needs, and increased the threats, then Russia would respond with military-technical reciprocal solutions.

What? What the hell did that mean?

Oh, we found out.

Now, in the kind of impudent reversal of the truth that nazis love, the west is blathering on and on about "security guarantees".

But only for Ukraine. No security for Russia.

And what they clearly mean by "security guarantees" is not a treaty with mutual respect and agreements, it is the US and the EU poodles promising to put their troops into Ukraine to attack Russia.

What part of "We are not going to put up with your marching to our borders and threatening us" do they not understand?

Are they really that stupid or do they just think we are?