When Gates Foreshadows, Pay Attention

As it turns out, our ruling overlords are more evil than a normal person could possibly believe.

And normal people are more gullible than I can believe. Unfortunately, our rulers know this and seem to be experimenting in some sort of mind control research to see how far they can take it. I picture them in their laboratories high fiving each over in glee when people swallow another ridiculous story. "Wow! They fell for it! We did it again!"

Smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide in 1980, (1953 in the US), which has been used as a triumph of vaccination ever since, including earlier this year, when True Believers hurled invective at resistors, telling them that taking the GMO injectible was the exact same thing as wiping out smallpox and the measles.

But our overlords have taught those same slurpers in only 9 months to completely change their tune. Now they tell you that of course this jab will not provide immunity or stop disease, no jab ever has.

Really? Really, slurpers? You have totally forgotten all that you were told your entire life, because the Mighty Wurlitzer of propaganda is now singing a different tune?

The Esteemed doctor and epidemiology expert, Bill Gates, has re-emerged from wherever he has been hiding in the last few months (shades of Dick Cheney disappearing for months after 9-11, while he was orchestrating the cover-up) and is now bleating a tune about the Return of Smallpox. And when Gates foreshadows, pay attention. He knows how the plot turns out.

But are people really going to fall for this??

Are they really going to allow the most evil of all people on the planet to concoct a tale about how smallpox accidentally fell out of a box, or was found to have an animal reservoir, or the Russians or domestic white supremacist terrorists skipped along flinging smallpox virions in Florida (I'm assuming they will target the most resistant of the states first)?

Because even though I am far more jaded and cynical than I ever wanted to be, I still can't believe that they would try to get away with this.

Except, deep down, I think they might.

Suicide By Teenager

There is a well known phenomenon called Suicide By Cop, where a person with suicidal ideation who is unwilling to do the deed themself outsources it to the police, by attacking them.

It turns out that Joseph Rosenbaum had been released from a mental hospital in Milwaukee that day last August. For some reason he was dropped off in the riot zone of Kenosha. Why?

I'm only speculating here, but watching the video of him spewing obscenities and the N word, screaming at people "Shoot me", and threatening armed men, he seemed like the kind of guy that wouldn't attract many admirers.

Is it possible that the discharge planner of that hospital in Milwaukee, faced with finding a home for that foul-mouthed child rapist, thought "I know just the place! Drop this piece of excrement off in Kenosha and let the police take care of him."

But the police were standing down, leaving ordinary citizens to protect the city. Oops!

Earth Humans Are Easy

My dad, a sunny optimist with a deep faith in humanity and a belief in Enlightenment ideals, truly believed that humans were basically good (like him) and wanted to live in peace and harmony with their fellow humans.

My mother, on the other hand, believed that most humans are two-faced assholes, ready to stab you in the back at any time.

My husband is another sunny natured optimist, unwavering in his belief that, given the opportunity, Americans would vote for peace, justice, freedom and environmental wisdom. He has spent endless hours of his life trying to reach his fellow citizens.

As an Enlightenment Baby, I have to say that we should use our reason, and take into account our experience and the research done in the century past, which, we have to admit (if we believe in science) proves the Thomases, Jefferson and Paine, to be wrong.

Humans are not rational beings, who take all available evidence, and weigh it in a calm and measured way, only to come up with the best answer.

We are creatures of emotion, most easily ruled by Hate and Fear, and our overlords play us like fiddles.

Freedom™

We live in a society in which we are watched constantly, in which our every communication is monitored and stored in giant databases, in which the government is working on collecting biological information on every person, in which there are fusion centers collating police and security state info, in which we cannot freely move around without presenting our papers, at the least, and our bodies, at most, for inspection by armed guards, in which we have militarized police, and 2,300,000 citizens in prison, in which we have 17 spy agencies, in which our media is controlled by 5 corporations, and our government is known to lie, in which top leaders are openly calling for censorship of our only means of horizontal communication, social media.

And now they are adding medical apartheid, in which people who refuse to submit to forced inoculation are openly called unclean and undeserving of parcipitating in normal society. "Papers please" now has a new requirement added.

Has there ever before, in human history, been a society so heavily monitored, watched, injected and controlled?

I would guess that there has never been a society so completely controlled that managed to simultaneously convince its citizens that they are "free".

Meet the New Normal Boss, Same as the Old Boss

The Experiment Continues

In the 60s a researcher named Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments in which the subjects were told they were participating in a teaching experiment, but the study was actually designed to measure compliance and obedience to authority. They were told to adminster shocks to the other subject (actually an accomplice to the designers) in increasingly severe levels, to see how far they would go when ordered. 65% of them administered what they thought was a lethal dose, when so ordered by a person of authority.

Milgram suggested that two things were needed to convince subjects to comply: One- The person giving the orders is perceived as being qualified to direct other people’s behavior. That is, they are seen as legitimate. Two- The person being ordered about believes that the authority will accept responsibility for what happens.

Ten months ago, researchers enrolled most of the adult populations in the industrialized countries in an experiment in which subjects were told they were receiving an injection that would protect them from infection of the SARS 2 virus. They were assured that if enough people complied, the population would reach herd immunity and all the restrictions on public life would be lifted. They were not, however, told that the authorities would accept responsibility for any bad outcomes. All agencies, the government, the medical industry and the media were enlisted to push this story and anyone speaking up to object were suppressed and banned.

Ten months in, we have been told that the injectable does not actually do what they promised it would. It does not protect the recipient from disease, it does not stop the spread of the disease and the restrictions have not been lifted.

If this experiment was actually about testing the safety and effectiveness of the drug, it would now be reasessed and the experiment stopped.

But instead the subjects are being told that since the product is ineffective, they need a booster shot. Clearly this is not about testing the product.

This is instead a continuance of the Milgram obedience experiments, a vast test of mass compliance to authority, even when authority has removed the second pillar of Milgram's hypothesis, the agreement to take responsibility for the results.

Targeting people's children is a new, and particularly unethical (in my opinion) twist. We have now sunk into Harry Harlow terrortory. Will people actually offer up their young to receive an injection that they know doesn't work for a disease that doesn't harm children? If I were a mad scientist I might be interested in this question. But as an ethical human being I am appalled.

A Call For Decorum

I mostly like men. They are usually pretty amiable and I appreciate the ones that can fix stuff.

But the men who are fixated on their genitals are off-putting, like those dogs you can't stop from noisily licking themselves.

There are the ones who are so enamored of their penises that they target random women with dic pics, apparently sure that said women will be equally impressed, and swoon with admiration and desire.

Worse now are the ones who dislike their genitals, because they have the backing of the Establishment to make sure that the entire society knows about their inner feelings, and makes allowances for their tender insides.

So we have things like everyone required to pick pronouns to force everyone around to use, so that no one accidentally devastates a man who feels distaste for his penis by using his non-preferred pronoun, because then he might react by committing violent acts like suicide and/or homicide (or just trashing the place in anger), and it would totally be the fault of the person speaking English, according to the Establishment. I see no reason for this policy. Genitals were nicknamed ''private parts'' for a reason. There is no reason that the general public should be exposed to people's internal feelings about their external genitals. Keep them to yourself, please, and we'll all be better off.